| GLENVILLE -- Three or four times
a year, Bill Fairchild fires up his transceiver and breaks out his
telegraph key, seeking contact with people around the globe. On a
recent weekday morning, he tapped out his name and call sign in
Morse code -- more slowly than he used to go, he said,
apologetically -- in response to WB2NVS, some guy named Lloyd in
Hackensack, N.J.
In staccato beeps, they exchanged names and locations. As the
signal began to fade, Fairchild signed off. Lloyd kept looking for
somebody to talk to, tapping "CQ," or "anybody out there?"
There sure is.
A proposal last month by the Federal Communications Commission to
eliminate the requirement for the top class of amateur radio
operators to learn Morse code has raised a lot of chatter among
local enthusiasts over a 150-year-old technology that supposedly has
no future.
And while many say they're disappointed with the FCC's proposal,
they also expect that the venerable dits and dahs won't be going
anywhere.
"There still will be Morse code, because it still has something
to give," Fairchild said.
It may seem hard to understand how, in an age of instant
messaging and e-mail and cellphones, anybody would want to use this
simple system.
But there's an undeniable mystique to it. Even Hackensack sounds
far away and exotic when it's reduced to code.
"We treat it as a foreign language, much as some people might
enjoy the ability to speak German, French, Spanish, what have you,"
said Bill Schwarting of Scotia, a retired teacher who has been an
amateur radio enthusiast since 1959.
He and several other local enthusiasts met last week and came up
with a consensus: Keep the code requirement.
The American Radio Relay League, the national amateur radio
group, opposes the plan, too.
The FCC proposed the switch to keep in step with regulations in
other countries, which dropped code requirements years ago.
Proponents of the change say that people who want to try the hobby
but are put off by learning Morse code might get advanced licenses
now. Lower amateur classes have already dropped the requirement.
"Morse code has outlived its usefulness," said Jay Freud, a
Clifton Park operator. "I think the United States should go with the
rest of the world."
For more than a century, the rest of the world was with Samuel
Morse. His telegraph wasn't the first mechanical means of
transmitting messages -- that invention belongs to a Frenchman, said
William Husson, a communications professor at the University at
Albany. Claude Chappe's device wasn't electrical but optical; using
movable mechanical arms, operators in towers 10 to 20 miles apart
relayed messages down the line.
But the system wasn't good at night, or in bad weather. So the
quest to develop an electrical system was on.
But 161 years after the first telegraph line was used, its
advocates say Morse's code has use.
For starters, code is quick. Enthusiasts love to point to a
demonstration on "The Tonight Show" in May that pitted a pair of
Morse code operators against two text-messagers. The telegraphers
won.
Its simplicity doesn't require oodles of bandwidth, as many
modern communications do. Advocates say that when storms lash the
area and electricity is cut, they can still get emergency messages
out on low-power transmitters.
"Code can get through when nothing else gets through," said
Howard Lester, a retired General Electric engineer. "With the most
simple equipment and the very lowest amount of power, the code will
get through when the voice will not."
Lester would know: He helped develop a form of digital cellphone
service while at GE that's in wide use today.
Others say that well-known shorthand makes it possible for
speakers of different languages to converse with each other, and
that people with speech impediments find it useful. Many use it for
hobby. Fairchild and others use code for contests in which the goal
is to make as many far-flung contacts as possible. Code is an
efficient way of doing that. And Lester, who goes on his radio every
day, said he and his son in Seattle have a weekly appointment to
signal each other. "We can get through all the time on code," he
said.
There are other, more personal reasons why many enthusiasts want
the FCC to mandate code.
Some say code keeps the rabble out. Others want everybody to
suffer as they did.
"Personally, I don't like it, because I had to do it the hard
way," said Walter Schick, a Schenectady man and 40-year radio
operator who left the hobby a year ago. "When I was learning Morse
code, I used to go down in the cellar and use the Morse code and
practice on it every night for at least an hour or two, and that
took me a long time."
While the community is largely resolute that code won't disappear
even if the FCC moves ahead with the requirements, there's a
wistfulness about the change. One longtime enthusiast, Ray Wemple,
said it was "rapidly becoming a lost art."
He sent his message by e-mail.
"You can't stop progress," Fairchild said. "I'm saddened by it. I
think it's a wonderful thing to have people to still know that
particular aspect of the hobby, but you could tell that the
handwriting was on the wall." |